Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have generated significant investor attention over the past decade, with many touting them as revolutionary financial instruments that promise a new era of decentralisation and financial freedom.
One of the primary arguments for investing in Bitcoin is its purported role as a hedge against inflation and the devaluation of fiat currencies, particularly the US dollar. However, a closer examination of recent market behaviour and underlying dynamics reveals several reasons why cryptocurrencies, especially Bitcoin, may not be suitable investments for retail investors based on this premise.
The thesis that Bitcoin acts as a hedge against inflation is rooted in its finite supply. Only 21 million bitcoins will ever exist, and scarcity denotes value. Proponents argue that this scarcity makes Bitcoin akin to digital gold, a store of value that should theoretically retain or increase in value as fiat currencies are devalued by inflationary pressures. The idea is that when inflation rises and fiat currencies lose purchasing power, finite assets like Bitcoin should hold their value or even appreciate, providing a safeguard for investors’ wealth.
Despite the theoretical underpinnings, the real-world evidence suggests that Bitcoin has not performed as a reliable hedge against inflation. When inflation surged beyond expectations in 2022, financial markets experienced significant turmoil. Equities and bonds declined significantly. During this period, instead of demonstrating resilience or appreciating in value, Bitcoin prices plummeted, mirroring the declines in traditional risk assets. This behaviour contradicts the inflation hedge thesis.
One of the critical factors undermining Bitcoin’s role as an inflation hedge is its high correlation with risk assets like the Nasdaq. Historically, hedging assets such as gold or treasury bonds have shown low or negative correlations with stocks, providing diversification benefits. Bitcoin, on the other hand, has displayed a strong positive correlation with tech stocks and other high-risk investments. When market sentiment shifts towards risk-off modes, Bitcoin tends to suffer alongside these assets rather than providing a safe haven.
Bitcoin’s price volatility is another significant concern. The cryptocurrency market is notoriously volatile, with prices often swinging wildly over short periods. This volatility is driven primarily by speculative trading rather than fundamental economic factors. Unlike traditional assets that are valued based on cash flows, earnings, or other tangible metrics, Bitcoin’s value is largely driven by market sentiment and speculative behaviour. This makes it a highly unpredictable investment vehicle.
Unlike stocks, which represent ownership in companies with productive assets and cash flows, or bonds, which provide regular interest payments, Bitcoin lacks intrinsic value. Its value is derived solely from the belief that others will value it more in the future, a concept often referred to as the “greater fool theory.” This speculative nature means that Bitcoin’s price can be heavily influenced by market psychology, making it a risky investment without any underlying economic utility.
For investors seeking hedges against inflation or market downturns, traditional assets like gold, real estate, and inflation-protected bonds (TIPS) have historically provided more reliable protection. These assets have proven track records and are supported by well-established markets and regulatory frameworks. They offer the potential for income, capital preservation, and in some cases, appreciation, without the extreme volatility and speculative nature associated with Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is more a vehicle for speculation on speculation rather than a sound investment strategy or even a valid constituent of a portfolio. There are much better alternatives.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.
