The opening weeks of 2026 have delivered relentless volatility that threatens to overwhelm even seasoned observers. From gold’s surge to cryptocurrency’s collapse, from Iranian protests to Venezuelan regime change, the velocity of events demands discipline: separating genuine structural shifts from transient noise.
Gold reached $5,595 per ounce before suffering its worst two-day decline since 1983, shedding nearly $1,200 in 48 hours. Yet as of mid-February, gold trades around $4,957, a $2,024 gain year-over-year. Despite turbulence, the precious metal remains substantially elevated, reflecting persistent safe-haven demand. JPMorgan forecasts gold will push towards $5,000 by Q4 2026, with $6,000 possible longer term, underpinned by relentless central bank accumulation.
Artificial intelligence has dominated headlines with extraordinary volatility, oscillating from euphoric highs to bubble fears. Palantir Technologies has declined approximately 22% in 2026, whilst Adobe, Salesforce, and ServiceNow have seen shares slide 25% to 30% year-to-date. The sell-off reflects sobering reassessment rather than fundamental deterioration. Stocks had run ahead of business fundamentals, creating valuation risk. Yet dismissing the AI investment cycle would be premature. These companies continue delivering strong operational results even as equity prices adjust. The question isn’t whether AI matters, but whether current valuations appropriately reflect realistic monetisation timelines.
President Trump named Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair in late January, ending unprecedented turmoil around the central bank. The nomination follows months of extraordinary pressure on Powell, including Department of Justice grand jury subpoenas threatening criminal indictment. Powell’s resolute resistance to political interference matters enormously for long-term market stability, even as it complicates near-term policy predictability.
The Trump administration’s foreign policy has delivered genuine shocks. On 3 January 2026, the United States launched military strike “Absolute Resolve” in Venezuela, capturing president Nicolás Maduro. Trump seeks $100 billion in foreign investments, whilst Energy Secretary Wright indicated Venezuelan oil sales had hit $1 billion and would reach $5 billion in months. The operation’s legality remains contested, yet oil price reactions have been muted, suggesting markets view Venezuelan production increases as a multi-year story.
Iran experienced massive protests in January, the largest uprising since 1979, brutally suppressed by security forces. Internal estimates indicated at least 30,000 killed in the first 48 hours. Despite speculation about American intervention, Trump refrained as security forces suppressed protests without regime fracture. Oil prices remained remarkably stable, suggesting markets had already priced significant Iranian geopolitical risk.
The S&P 500’s concentration in the Magnificent Seven has finally prompted reconsideration of diversification. These seven stocks account for 32.6% of the S&P 500 as of mid-February 2026, up from 12.5% in 2016. Over the first six weeks of 2026, the S&P 500 declined 0.1% whilst the Magnificent Seven lost 6.3%, with Microsoft down 17% and Amazon down 13.9%. This concentration creates hidden dangers that market-weighted index funds fail to address.
Emerging markets have delivered exceptional performance. After returning 34% in 2025, the MSCI EM Index rose 7% year-to-date through early February, driven by dollar weakness, attractive valuations, and AI investment. The dollar has declined 11% over the past year. LPL forecasts 29% emerging market earnings growth in 2026 compared to just 14% in the US.
Cryptocurrency has suffered brutal correction that challenges the “digital gold” narrative. Bitcoin has lost half its value from its October peak, falling below $63,000 in early February. The continued divergence between gold (up 24% since October) and bitcoin (down 50%) has discredited the digital gold thesis. Bitcoin generates no cash flows, pays no dividends, creates no products, it exists as purely speculative asset whose value depends entirely on others’ willingness to pay more tomorrow.
Several certainties merit emphasis as 2026 progresses. Volatility will persist in both directions. Markets remain fundamentally unpredictable over shorter timeframes, even as longer-term principles prove reliable. Investors possess no control over geopolitical events, making portfolio resilience rather than market timing the essential objective.
Active management deserves renewed attention precisely because Goldilocks scenarios don’t persist indefinitely. The imperative remains clear: stay invested, maintain diversification, resist futile market timing, and allow experienced managers to navigate complexity. The year ahead will test conviction and reward patience, separating disciplined capital allocation from reactive panic.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.
