The US stock market has been going through a rough patch over the past month, and the main reason behind this is uncertainty about the economic policies of the Trump administration. While most people agree that this is the root of the issue, there is less agreement on whether the decline is due to policies that could reduce corporate profits or simply because no one knows exactly what the policies will be.
Many investors are hoping that things will become clearer on April 2nd. This is the date the administration had chosen to announce new tariffs, taxes on imported goods, that would apply to certain countries and industries. The big question is: Will April 2nd bring clarity, or will it make things even more confusing? In the short term, this uncertainty is the biggest factor influencing the stock market.
A tariff is a tax placed on imported goods. Imagine you run a small business selling bicycles. If the US government places a tariff on imported bicycle parts, it means those parts will become more expensive. This could force you to raise prices, which might drive customers away. On a larger scale, when entire industries face tariffs, companies earn less profit, which makes investors nervous and causes stock prices to drop.
Financial analyst Thierry Wizman, from investment firm Macquarie, shared his thoughts on the situation recently. He said that with the appointment of a new US Trade Representative (USTR), Jamieson Greer, there was hope that tariff policies would become more structured and easier to understand. According to Wizman, the worst of the uncertainty might already be behind us.
The new trade representative was expected to introduce a system where each country would have a specific tariff rate based on how that country taxes US goods. This approach, Wizman suggested, could bring some predictability and flexibility to trade policy.
However, even Wizman acknowledged that April 2nd might not resolve all the uncertainties. While he hoped for a more structured approach, he also recognised that many details were still unclear. Investors were watching closely to see if the administration could shift away from chaotic policy changes and adopt a more predictable strategy.
According to reports from Bloomberg, President Trump’s trade negotiator, Greer, was working to bring more structure to the administration’s trade policies. Over the past two months, tariff announcements had been confusing and unpredictable. But now, the USTR was asking for public feedback before making decisions. This means businesses and industry experts could provide input before tariffs were finalised, allowing for a more balanced approach.
Another positive sign for investors was that key officials in the administration were pushing to move beyond trade disputes and focus on policies that investors prefer, like tax cuts and reduced regulations. This shift could help stabilize the market.
A report from The Wall Street Journal suggested that the White House was slowly moving towards a more structured tariff plan. Instead of making rules on a case-by-case basis, officials were considering a system where tariffs would be calculated based on a country’s overall trade practices. However, there were still many unanswered questions, such as how to factor in government subsidies and currency policies.
Additionally, new tariffs of 25% are thought to be being considered for cars, semiconductors, and pharmaceutical products. This was another area of concern for investors, as industries like pharmaceuticals had previously been exempt from tariffs. If these new taxes were introduced, it could have significant impacts on businesses in those sectors.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently appeared on television to try to reassure investors, too. He confirmed that each country would have its own tariff rate and emphasised that the US was willing to negotiate. In other words, if a country reduced its trade barriers, the US might lower tariffs in return.
However, he also made it clear that tariffs on certain strategic industries, like steel and aluminium, were here to stay. Additionally, he mentioned a list of 15 countries with which the US had large trade deficits. These countries would be the primary focus of the administration’s trade policies.
Despite these efforts to provide clarity, many details remain vague. For example, it is unclear which industries, beyond steel and aluminium, will be considered “strategic” and subject to permanent tariffs. Some investors assume that pharmaceuticals will be exempt, but there is no official confirmation. Additionally, there is confusion about whether different types of tariffs will be stacked on top of each other, making the overall tax burden even higher.
At the core of this issue, there are two major questions that remain unanswered: (1) Can the Trump administration come together to support a single, well-organized trade policy? (2) How will other countries react?
Markets will, hopefully, soon have more much-needed clarity. The market will be watching closely, and the way the administration handles the announcement will have a major impact on investor confidence.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the author at the date of publication and not necessarily those of Dominion Capital Strategies Limited or its related companies. The content of this article is not intended as investment advice and will not be updated after publication. Images, video, quotations from literature and any such material which may be subject to copyright is reproduced in whole or in part in this article on the basis of Fair use as applied to news reporting and journalistic comment on events.
